The British press undoubtedly plays a substantial role in shaping public opinion. It's no secret that media outlets often compete for readership through sensational headlines and stories. Some suggest that negative coverage of Meghan and Harry generates more interest and, subsequently, higher profits for these outlets. This could be a contributing factor to the negative portrayal they receive.
British society is known for its adherence to tradition and norms, and any deviation from these can be met with resistance. Meghan, as an American actress of mixed-race heritage, represented a significant departure from the typical royal spouse. This change might have been unsettling for some segments of the population.
In the digital age, social media has a substantial impact on public perception. Anyone with an internet connection can voice their opinions, and this can lead to the amplification of both positive and negative sentiments. Meghan and Harry have been active on social media, which has both bolstered their support and attracted criticism.
It's important to acknowledge that Meghan and Harry were public figures before entering the royal family. Their previous careers in the entertainment industry brought them fame and a fan following. However, this background might have also made them more susceptible to celebrity-style scrutiny.
The official response of the royal family to Meghan and Harry's experiences has also been a topic of discussion. Some argue that a more robust defense from the family could have curbed some of the negative media coverage.
The reasons behind the negative public perception of Meghan and Harry in some quarters, particularly in the British press, are multifaceted. Historical context, media influence, social and cultural factors, social media dynamics, and the couple's own backgrounds all contribute to the complex narrative surrounding them.
